I would have let him pray. It is not harming anyone since it is after the games. It was also stated that he didn’t force anyone to pray with him. So therefore there is nothing wrong with this.
I would have been on Joes side because we all have rights as individuals, he stood by them and the court could see that which is a factor of why he won the case
I would have let him pray since It is his beliefs and there is nothing anything a person can do to change that and if they bring this all the way to the supreme court I think that is total offensive.
Pingback: High School Coach Goes All the Way to Supreme Court to Pray After Game – Kevin Mauermann's WordPress Site
I would have let him pray. It is not harming anyone since it is after the games. It was also stated that he didn’t force anyone to pray with him. So therefore there is nothing wrong with this.
I would’ve let him play because he’s not forcing anyone to pray with him and it doesn’t affect the game.
I would let him pray because no one is being harmed or bothered.
I would rule in his favor because someone filated his religious rights
I would say he could be prayer because of the ruling they said
I would have done the same thing after the first time at court.
This is cool but they shouldn’t tell him what to do
I would have ruled to let him pray. It is his beliefs and was not forcing people to pray with him, and not harming others during his praying time.
This was very cool.
I would have been on Joes side because we all have rights as individuals, he stood by them and the court could see that which is a factor of why he won the case
I would have let him pray since It is his beliefs and there is nothing anything a person can do to change that and if they bring this all the way to the supreme court I think that is total offensive.
I would let him pray because he is doing no harm to himself or anyone else. He also didn’t make anyone pray with him
I would’ve let him pray because he wasn’t forcing anyone to pray with him neither was he stopping the game